Posted: August 15th, 2012 | Author: Harpal | Filed under: Cloud computing, FX Aggreation, Platform-as-a-service | Tags: FX Platform | 1 Comment »
The head of the United States Patent Office, Charles Duell, is credited with arguing in 1899 to close the Patent Office because “everything that could have been invented, has been invented.”
In the early 1940s, IBM’s president, Thomas J Watson, reputedly said: “I think there is a world market for about five computers.”
Jon Corzine, then-CEO of MF Global, in a company-wide email after a downgrade by Moody’s wrote in late October 2011: “While I am disappointed by this action, it bears no implications for our clients or the strategic direction of MF Global.” And: “The sun will come up tomorrow.”
In July 2012, one can read in an article in FXWeek that “The flurry of new trading platforms that have launched in the foreign exchange market in recent months is unsustainable …and will undoubtedly lead to further consolidation as the successful ventures are acquired and the unsuccessful ones are pushed out of the market, according to speakers at the FX Week USA conference in New York last week”.
Leaprate.com echoed this sentiment stating that “It is also hard to believe that all these firms will each build up enough volume to create worthwhile businesses.”
If you started out chuckling about how woefully shortsighted some people were in previous centuries, you can tell by now that we have comfortably arrived in the present and the current discussion about the proliferation of FX platforms. Are you still smiling? I am not. It baffles me to read story after story about ‘platform proliferation’ as a result of a measly 6 new ones that were announced by a variety of industry participants in the last 2 months. In that time frame, Integral alone launches that many and more on behalf of its customers. Read More »
Posted: March 30th, 2012 | Author: Harpal | Filed under: Cloud computing, FX Aggreation, Liquidity, Platform-as-a-service, Risk Management, market maker | Tags: change, FX markets, market growth, market makers | 1 Comment »
Reading industry-related headlines over the last eight months or so must have been scary. Volumes dipped to historic lows towards the end of last year and some major players including many market making banks and large ECNs have been experiencing internal reorganizations with the associated departure of high-profile executives. Let me state for the record that this is not an attempt to judge anyone as they are going through tough times. This is an attempt to put what is happening into perspective and provide FX market participants with a better understanding of what we are experiencing. Where many see only gloom and doom, I also see a story about opportunity and growth.
One-size-fits-all era is coming to an end
In a recent commentary on personnel changes at EBS, Colin Lambert, Profit & Loss (restricted access), puts the finger for the firm’s difficulties at “increasing competitive pressure” and suggest among other things that EBS is “feeling the squeeze from internalisation and more granular streaming from banks”. I don’t want to make light of what this may mean for individuals affected by these restructurings, but for the industry as a whole, these changes are a positive sign. They prove that FX markets are maturing, that competition is increasing and that the one-size-fits-all area in FX is coming to an end. The future will see a much larger number of different business models, liquidity sources, risk management approaches, FX exchanges, all co-existing in an even larger market than FX is today.
Read More »
Posted: June 6th, 2011 | Author: Harpal | Filed under: Cloud computing, FX Aggreation, Platform-as-a-service, Software-as-a-service | Tags: cloudcomputing, FX Grid, PaaS, SaaS | 1 Comment »
Not all clouds are the same, and I am not talking about the different ones you see up in the sky. The term cloud computing has reached true buzzword status by now, with everyone having a different understanding of what it means — which by the way is one characteristic of a buzzword.
I don’t want to add to the many interpretations of cloud computing out there, rather outline the most important characteristics that in my view define it: 1) Market participants receive and deliver services over the Internet. 2) They are sharing a common pool of IT infrastructure. 3) They have the ability to easily scale these services up or down in line with how their business needs change. 4) They pay for these services in a pay-as-you-go business model and, and 5) these services are managed by a provider. If all these statements are true, you are looking at a real example of cloud computing.
Today, Integral announced an open platform for FX. While ‘open’ to some might just be yet another buzzword, it is critically important in this context. Read More »
Posted: February 17th, 2011 | Author: Harpal | Filed under: FX Aggreation, Liquidity, Risk Management | 1 Comment »
When trading in larger sizes, liquidity takers have come to understand that FX aggregation services have a profound positive impact on the quality of the execution they see. They know the risks involved and want to be sure that they are getting the best deal possible. An FX aggregation and Execution Management System (EMS) understands how to aggregate different streams from liquidity providers who each may have imposed their own trading rules, and still ensures that you’ll get what you clicked on. To that end, an FX aggregator is a trader’s best friend in ensuring competitive bids. It virtually guarantees (pun intended) tight spreads on the top of the book, full fill in the market with little slippage, and even possible price improvements.
While a majority of traders intuitively understand its value when trading $20m,$50m or more, they are sometimes ignore its advantages when trading $500k, $2.5m or $5m. That might be because with large trades, the monetary value often is self-evident vs. with smaller trades, the value is strategic and harder to quantify.
Short-term gain but long-term pain
Long term trading strategy, not short term cost concerns, should be driving your trading system choices. Here is why you shouldn’t trade smaller amounts on a single-bank system, even if it offers tighter rates.
Read More »
Posted: June 30th, 2010 | Author: Harpal | Filed under: FX Aggreation, Liquidity, Risk Management | No Comments »
As the operator of FX Grid, a global inter-institutional connectivity and trading network, linking market making banks to FX market participants, we are getting good visibility in how other systems are performing. During the hectic days in May that put strains on everybody’s systems, we know for instance who had outages. (Integral did fine by the way. Read more in our press release and in an earlier blog post.) Single-bank systems were among the ones that suffered the most severe outages. I see this as a clear indicator that their decline is ongoing, despite some marketing hype.
Greenwich Associates already reported in April 2008 that “single-bank systems are failing to keep pace with the growth of multi-dealer platforms.” (E-Forex Comes of Age, Greenwich Associates, e-Forex Magazine, April 2008). In analyzing the results of its 2010 FX survey, Euromoney magazine made several observations that substantiate this claim. Euromoney writes: “The top three banks in the survey accounted for 40.44% of the total market in 2010, compared to 45.99% in 2009.”While Euromoney doesn’t say to where the market shifted, the fact that it continues to move away from the largest financial institutions suggests that single-bank systems are still losing market share. In my opinion, multi-dealer systems have clear advantages and the market seems to agree. Here are the four key arguments that proof my point. Read More »
Posted: May 14th, 2010 | Author: Harpal | Filed under: FX Aggreation | Tags: FX aggregation model, FX Grid | No Comments »
Last week ended with a bang.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that on Thursday, “At one point, the euro fell 8% against the yen, ending down 5.5%. Given currency traders’ leverage, some may face crushing losses.”
Further: “Despite the euro’s 0.75% gain versus the dollar Friday, it suffered its worst week since the height of the global crisis in October 2008. The common currency was down about 4.4% from last Friday and down about 11% since the end of 2009.”
The New York Times reported that “The major indexes gyrated on Friday before closing down sharply on continued fears that the Greek debt crisis would spread and lingering questions about Thursday’s sudden plunge.”
So, was it a bad trading day all over? Here is a different tune from ForexMagnates, an FX blog that is written by Michael Greenberg: “What follows is Integral press release which states that Integral not only didn’t experience any difficulties but also pretty much enjoyed the day. I don’t yet have the exact details regarding who failed to deliver and who passed this crazy day unscathed but it seems that Integral’s aggregation model is working.”
Read More »